Contact
Contact and Corrections
How to reach Myth & Mint, what to send when a guide is wrong, and how corrections and reviewed dates are handled.
Myth & Mint has one mailbox, and it is read by the person who writes the guides. Corrections, source disputes, policy questions, and privacy requests all go to the same address.
This is the only contact channel. There is no contact form, no comment section, and no mailing list, and the site does not collect reader details anywhere else. What happens to information you send, and what the site processes when you simply visit, is described in the Privacy Policy.
Reporting a correction
Corrections are welcome and they are taken seriously. A report is easiest to act on when it contains four things:
- The page. The full URL of the guide, and the section or heading the problem is under.
- The exact claim. The sentence, table row, card name, or figure you believe is wrong. Quoting it removes any ambiguity about which line you mean.
- What is wrong. The correct fact, stated plainly: the right card name, the right legality result, the right printing, the right total.
- A source. A link to the primary source that shows it: a Scryfall card page, the Wizards format or banned list page, the Comprehensive Rules, or the merchant listing. If the point is about a price or a listing, include the date you looked.
A short note with a URL and a sentence is still worth sending. Partial reports get checked too; the list above just makes the check faster.
How a correction is evaluated
Every report is checked against the same sources the guide was built from, in the order set out in the editorial and research methodology. Rules and legality are re-checked against Wizards of the Coast, card data and prices against Scryfall, and product identity against the merchant listing.
If the source shows the guide is wrong, the guide is wrong and gets fixed. If the source shows the guide is right, you get a reply explaining what was checked and where the number came from. Disagreement about a judgment call, such as whether a card earns its slot, is treated as feedback rather than as a correction, and it is read carefully either way.
How corrections are published
What happens next depends on what was wrong:
- Typos, broken links, and formatting are fixed in place without ceremony. Nothing about the guide's substance changed.
- Material factual corrections - a wrong card, an incorrect legality or banned-list claim, a total that does not add up, a misattributed source - are corrected on the page and stated there, so a returning reader can see that the substance changed and what changed. A substantive rewrite also moves the guide's updated date.
- Re-checks that confirm the guide move its reviewed date. That date records when the sources and merchant links were last verified, not when the prose was last touched.
One thing that is not a correction: a price that has simply moved since the snapshot. Every priced figure belongs to the date printed next to it, and the market moving afterwards is expected rather than an error. A stale link, a product that no longer matches the card described, or a figure that was wrong on its own stated date all are corrections, and are worth reporting.
Other reasons to write
- Funding and merchant links: questions about how the site makes money, or about any link on it, are answered. The current position is on the affiliate disclosure page.
- Privacy requests: access, correction, deletion, and appeal requests are handled under the Privacy Policy. Send enough detail for the request to be understood.
- Rights and permissions: reuse, attribution, and intellectual-property questions are covered by the Terms of Use.
- Suggestions: a deck, budget, set, or collecting question you want covered.
Who you are writing to
Myth & Mint is published by Brybrydataguy LLC and run by one person; the About page explains the arrangement. Replies come from that same person, so allow a little time.